Economics discussion exercise – Keynes v Hayek

This year I am trying to get students to develop a deeper understanding of economic issues and to improve their evaluation skills for the written exam. The goal is that students will arrive at a collective meaning, rather than seek a “right” answer. Below is a plan of how you could structure the discussion.

Subject content – Economic schools of thought. Keynes v Hayek – this is part of Unit 9 of the CAIE A2 syllabus.

Content knowledge: Types of economies (left and right wing) covered at CAIE AS Level. The schools of thought are taught in class and questions (MCQ) and short answer are used to test student understanding of the characteristics of each. The two videos below are useful to consolidate knowledge.

Austrian economics and Keynesian economics explained in 1 minute. See below

Music (rap) video ‘Fear the boom and bust’ – Keynes v Hayek. See below

One of the challenges is to keep students on task and try and get contributions from all students. In order to overcome these issues I have developed a set of playing cards with certain statements on each. Students receive 8 playing cards with different assessment objectives/ skills/ elements of written work in economics – see photo. Students can only talk when they place a card on the table. Once a student has used up all their cards they can no longer contribute to the discussion. The link below has more detail on this method:

https://econfix.wordpress.com/2022/09/20/using-playing-cards-for-economics-discussions-2/

Tutorial preparation (outside the classroom)

Students read a media extract on the topic. Extract selection is important – not too long and must be easy to relate to core knowledge. I have picked the article by Larry Elliott in the Guardian newspaper as this is media that is different to what students tend to be exposed to.

Guardian Weekly

‘Like COVID-19, capitalism has evolved a new variant to survive’ Larry Elliott

Number of students in a group is a determining factor – 8 to a group.

Tutorial/discussion over 2 periods

Opening question – essential that this is pitched at the level appropriate to the group as the intention is for the discussion to proceed through student interactions.

The new variant of capitalism should be the dominant policy option for governments.

If this is question doesn’t engage the students you could ask some of the following questions:

  • Start off with a simple question that is referenced from the text – ‘What aspects of Keynesian economics are evident in the extract?’
  • Allow each student to answer the opening question – 30 seconds. Other responses can spark conversation once everyone has replied.
  • Get students to continually reference the text so to keep the conversation relevant

Coaching – there may be the need to encourage deeper and more critical thinking. Need to avoid teaching by offering analysis and possible evaluations. Some questions to encourage critical thinking:

  • Why was the Keynesian variant relinquished in the 1970’s?
  • How did the 2008 GFC influence government policy?
  • Was austerity the answer to the issues caused by the GFC?
  • How did COVID-19 impact policy for left right and centre governments?

Should allow students to respond from their own perspective but must be related to the extract.

Student reflection – the hope is that students are able to develop a deeper understanding of the complexities of the subject content and read newspaper/magazine articles with a more holistic view of the how an economy works. The level of scaffolding for reflection will vary with each student but there is potential for all students to feel more confident in their knowledge and participation in future discussions.

Sign up to elearneconomics for comprehensive key notes with coloured illustrations, flash cards, written answers and multiple-choice tests on Keynes v Hayek that provides for users with different learning styles working at their own pace (anywhere at any time).
 

Advertisement

Keynes v Hayek with Chinese characteristics.

You will no doubt have heard about the battle of ideas – Keynes v Hayek. In the 1930’s this was probably the most famous debate in the history of economics – the battle of ideas -government v markets.

Now there is Chinese version of the debate:

Justin Lin (Keynes) versus Zhang Weiying (Hayek) – both are Professors at Peking University. Lin is on the right of the image below.

lin-v-zhangTheir latest debate is about industrial policy and the concept that the government can set the example of how to run successful industries – in the 1980’s textiles and today renewable energy. Although China’s growth record would seem to justify this some have seen these state run industries produce little innovation. Lin believes that countries that have a comparative advantage should receive help from the government whether it be in the form of tax cuts or improved infrastructure. Furthermore, because resources are limited the government should help in identifying industries which have earning  potential. This assistance includes subsidies, tax breaks and financial incentives — aimed at supporting specific industries considered crucial for the nation’s economic growth.

Zhang sees this industrial policy as a failure in that he believes government officials don’t know enough about new technologies.  He uses the example in the 1990s, when the Chinese government spent significant money on the television industry only for the cathode ray tubes to become outdated. He is also concerned about industrial inertia with local officials following the central government’s direction which tends to lead to an overcapacity. Zhang, however, credited the free market — not politically motivated government subsidies — with game-changing innovations that benefit society eg. James Watt and the steam engine, George Stephenson’s intercity railway, and Jack Ma’s innovative online marketplaces under Alibaba.

China’s ongoing transition to a market-based economy has relied on labour, capital and resource-intensive industries. But the transition’s negative side effects have included structural imbalances and excess capacity in certain sectors. Moreover, some state-owned enterprises such as telecoms have been challenged by disruptive innovators, such as social networks.

Zhang said industrial policy can foster greed. For example, companies may collude with government officials to win special favours. And policymakers can make mistakes, given that even the most well-informed intellectual cannot always predict market trends. Other economists have contributed to the debate stating that a lot of the most successful companies have not had any government assistance in their early years.

However the debate is sure to continue – what works best ‘Markets or Governments’?

Sources:

The Economist – 5th November 2016

CaixinOnline